Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 142 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2008 10:24:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2008 10:24:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 98453 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2008 10:24:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 98126 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2008 10:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 98115 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2008 10:24:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:24:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:23:36 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KXZEz-0008Vr-Ve for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:24:05 -0700 Message-ID: <19141241.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:24:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Artur Siekielski To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: LIFO (not FIFO) queues In-Reply-To: <19090578.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: artur.siekielski@gmail.com References: <19088116.post@talk.nabble.com> <19090578.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >From what I've understood the Camel Resequencer is not a solution for us, because it collects items for some time (defined by timeout) and then sends them to output queue. We need a real priority queue where even old messages can be reordered. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LIFO-%28not-FIFO%29-queues-tp19088116p19141241.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.