activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean-Yves LEBLEU" <jleb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Activemq 4.1 vs 5.1 memory usage
Date Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:54:54 GMT
Hi,

We have an application currently running very well with activeMq 4.1, I
tried to migrate to 5.1 and I had to go back to 4.1 due to excessive memory
leak.
I was unable to find the reason ... so still waiting to have some more time
to investigate.
JY

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:24 PM, xersmith29 <xersmith29@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Guys,
>
> We are currently using activemq v4.1 and we would like to port and move to
> v5.1. All have been setup and testing is done. Stability wise, v5.1 is
> clear
> about it and more stable compare to v4.1, but we notice something about the
> new version 5.1, it actually have a higher cpu utilization compare to v4.1.
> Is there a way to improve it? Please help. Thanks.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Activemq-4.1-vs-5.1-memory-usage-tp18869211p18869211.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message