activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nicolas Mervaillie" <nmervail...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: pure master/slave
Date Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:37:21 GMT
Hi all,

For a test case, see http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1820

cheers

Nicolas

2008/8/18 Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>

> Yes - this is bizarre - and what you are seeing is not by design
> Could you submit a test case ?
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Davies
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On 18 Aug 2008, at 02:13, AD wrote:
>
>  It doesnt seem that this comment from the site is in the context of a
>> failover, only that if a master cant contact a slave, it wont process
>> messages.  In a cluster setup this seems quite bizarre that the system
>> would
>> stop responding if the passive node was down.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  Yes that is exactly right.  The master cannot take over from the slave.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <linlx2008@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I have found
>>>>
>>> that
>>>
>>>> the master broker is down as well.
>>>> AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
>>> http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
>>>
>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://open.iona.com
>>>
>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message