activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: pure master/slave
Date Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:15:25 GMT
Yes - this is bizarre - and what you are seeing is not by design
Could you submit a test case ?

cheers,

Rob

Rob Davies
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/


On 18 Aug 2008, at 02:13, AD wrote:

> It doesnt seem that this comment from the site is in the context of a
> failover, only that if a master cant contact a slave, it wont process
> messages.  In a cluster setup this seems quite bizarre that the  
> system would
> stop responding if the passive node was down.
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Hiram Chirino  
> <hiram@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>
>> Yes that is exactly right.  The master cannot take over from the  
>> slave.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <linlx2008@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I have  
>>> found
>> that
>>> the master broker is down as well.
>>> AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://open.iona.com
>>


Mime
View raw message