activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: pure master/slave
Date Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:55:15 GMT
Great!  thx!

On 19 Aug 2008, at 13:37, Nicolas Mervaillie wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> For a test case, see http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1820
>
> cheers
>
> Nicolas
>
> 2008/8/18 Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
>
>> Yes - this is bizarre - and what you are seeing is not by design
>> Could you submit a test case ?
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> Rob Davies
>> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 Aug 2008, at 02:13, AD wrote:
>>
>> It doesnt seem that this comment from the site is in the context of a
>>> failover, only that if a master cant contact a slave, it wont  
>>> process
>>> messages.  In a cluster setup this seems quite bizarre that the  
>>> system
>>> would
>>> stop responding if the passive node was down.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes that is exactly right.  The master cannot take over from the  
>>> slave.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <linlx2008@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I  
>>>>> have found
>>>>>
>>>> that
>>>>
>>>>> the master broker is down as well.
>>>>> AMQ developer, would you please explain it for us. Thanks a lot.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/pure-master-slave-tp18831368p18845063.html
>>>>
>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hiram
>>>>
>>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>>
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://open.iona.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message