activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Fernandez <joe.fernan...@ttmsolutions.com>
Subject Re: Large networks of brokers, dynamically included destinations and temporary queues
Date Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:21:22 GMT

Hi Eric,

As long as there exists the appropriate forwarding bridge(s), w/correct
networkTTL, from the consumer's broker back to the producer's broker, there
shouldn't be a problem with using the request/reply model and temp queues. 

I recommend moving up to 5.1. 

There have been some issues surrounding 'duplex' connections; you may want
to check the JIRA for their status. 

Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com  



Eric-AWL wrote:
> 
> Hi every body
> 
> I want to create a large configuration with dozens of servers. I would
> want to distinguish groups of servers by role and assign them static queue
> names prefix. To avoid large number of hops, I imagine creating several
> different network of brokers connections which will be associated by
> multicast groups (with a good dynamicallyIncludedDestinations
> configuration)
> 
>  http://www.nabble.com/file/p19070151/Nabble.jpeg 
> 
> I explain : when I am connected on a broker of group "A*" and want to
> produce a message for Queue "B*", I send it to my broker which knows that
> all messages for Queues B* must be dispatch to a group of brokers which
> manage B* consumers. And so on for groups C, D, E, F .... (a sort of full
> web topology)
> 
> each group has a dedicated network of brokers for each prefix of static
> queues.
> 
> Some of my messages must have an answer, and I imagine using temporary
> queues, consumer on them and JMSReply for answer. 
> 
> With this configuration, is there a risk that the answer which must be
> sent to the temporary queue, doesn't use a direct connection and follow a
> long way to find the requestor ?
> 
> In such configuration, is it better to use duplex network connectors or
> two different connectors ?
> 
> I can use ActiveMQ 5.1 if it is better.
> 
> Thank in advance
> Eric-AWL
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Large-networks-of-brokers%2C-dynamically-included-destinations-and-temporary-queues-tp19070151p19072871.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message