activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric-AWL <eric.vinc...@atosorigin.com>
Subject Large networks of brokers, dynamically included destinations and temporary queues
Date Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:34:42 GMT

Hi every body

I want to create a large configuration with dozens of servers. I would want
to distinguish groups of servers by role and assign them static queue names
prefix. To avoid large number of hops, I imagine creating several different
network of brokers connections which will be associated by multicast groups
(with a good dynamicallyIncludedDestinations configuration)

http://www.nabble.com/file/p19070151/Nabble.jpeg 

I explain : when I am connected on a broker of group "A*" and want to
produce a message for Queue "B*", I send it to my broker which knows that
all messages for Queues B* must be dispatch to a group of brokers which
manage B* consumers. And so on for groups C, D, E, F .... (a sort of full
web topology)

each group has a dedicated network of brokers for each prefix of static
queues.

Some of my messages must have an answer, and I imagine using temporary
queues, consumer on them and JMSReply for answer. 

With this configuration, is there a risk that the answer which must be sent
to the temporary queue, doesn't use a direct connection and follow a long
way to find the requestor ?

In such configuration, is it better to use duplex network connectors or two
different connectors ?

I can use ActiveMQ 5.1 if it is better.

Thank in advance
Eric-AWL
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Large-networks-of-brokers%2C-dynamically-included-destinations-and-temporary-queues-tp19070151p19070151.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message