activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Stewart <rds6...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Only memory transaction store with JDBC persistence adapter??
Date Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:09:20 GMT


Ryan Stewart wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> In this class, preparedTransactions is a LinkedHashMap. Perhaps someone
> has made the mistaken assumption that the TransactionId object contains
> all the necessary data for recovering a transaction? All of the
> TransactionStore implementations have similar code for the prepare method,
> though the MemoryTransactionStore used by the JDBCPersistenceAdapter
> doesn't even write a transaction event to the database.
> 

I'm still waiting for someone to tell me I'm wrong about this. Should I
create a JIRA issue for it?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Only-memory-transaction-store-with-JDBC-persistence-adapter---tp18657395p18810956.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message