Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5263 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2008 05:23:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2008 05:23:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 20184 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2008 05:23:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20172 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2008 05:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20158 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2008 05:23:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:23:20 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rationalpi@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.242] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:22:28 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so2444515rvb.26 for ; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:22:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=DrkkEx8Vxr0ogvQLws8BNtS3ZOIlqzLVkk26LvmbvGY=; b=Bx2TKkMaEXHgBlN5gOlraQiTHtL8Uq2IAW76OREXuTNyoQgIOHWuFQSV5X9Va4oSz/ TYLs7CQ7jHt24NsGQTRCsMXm7APZLz0trLDST5TnM3DsayVd+yWAkpMnXRvJpRpWZvNl CASfG/kClkhCA9I23/X0MuNJM+77cXLnHnAAg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Te8++aLfnALbKwu1rkgqKlSMl/tWZiwPx9BI2jV4CDATyFWPwp/jmOhbgpSjZ0VaXJ Jx51xeOPPT29JQ1+/Z+CuFKl+RCKt+2yXcNYURMcw2ajm8U4KunqgNrhsbDbhaJYU+Up LAx0gaEyz5ZkxvgMLlpzr3eXnzWrfjWmC/MO8= Received: by 10.140.157.1 with SMTP id f1mr1998490rve.220.1215408170106; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.114.11 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2fa5cd80807062222t4d3d465cy1d8078c0627f8545@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 01:22:50 -0400 From: "Joshua Smith" Sender: rationalpi@gmail.com To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ObjectMessage in C/C++ In-Reply-To: <4B46C2BE-D965-4A28-B024-F2A0012B767A@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21093_26005710.1215408170092" References: <2fa5cd80807061844u5d0d4ff3p94a9442ce356623c@mail.gmail.com> <2fa5cd80807062053v5c89d515ic07be51ca00c33a5@mail.gmail.com> <4B46C2BE-D965-4A28-B024-F2A0012B767A@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 60738288aeb09141 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_21093_26005710.1215408170092 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks again Nathan. I'll give those references a look. Joshua Smith On 7/7/08, Nathan Mittler wrote: > > Joshua, > The C++ application wouldn't consume a JMS ObjectMessage; rather, it would > have the message transformed to something it can consume, say XML. This > transformation process is where Apache Camel comes in. The ActiveMQ 5.x > broker can embed Camel components that will allow you to define a custom > transformer that receives on one messaging channel, transforms the message, > and then sends out the new message to your C++ application on another > channel. > > This link shows the basics for configuring Camel in your ActiveMQ broker: > http://activemq.apache.org/enterprise-integration-patterns.html > > And this should help you get started with Camel: > http://activemq.apache.org/camel/getting-started.html > > Regards, > Nate > > On Jul 6, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Joshua Smith wrote: > > Thanks Nathan. I went and looked at the link. Could you describe how this >> works a little more? Is the C++ program doing something different or am I >> configuring ActiveMQ to do something different when the client is a C++ >> application? How does Camel fit into the picture? >> >> Thanks, >> Joshua Smith >> >> ------=_Part_21093_26005710.1215408170092--