Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <18494476.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shimik <shimi.k@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does multicast transport exist?
In-Reply-To: <18490609.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <18488375.post@talk.nabble.com> <18490609.post@talk.nabble.com>


According to these posts there are others who are looking for the same thing.
I can't figure out if it exist or not.
http://www.nabble.com/Reliable-Multicast-and-ActiveMQ-td17806853.html
http://www.nabble.com/It-is-possible-to-configure-Broker-Client-to-use-reliable-UDP-protocol-for-Topics-and-TCP-IP-for-Queues--td17992071.html
http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-ConnectionTransport--td18283185.html


Maybe someone can shade light on this issue.

Shimi


David Crisp wrote:
> 
> Hi Shimik,
>     I'm looking for the same info, although I'm currently on 4.1.2.
> When I did a code dive, I noticed that there are multicast connectors
> (transport & network) although they appear to be unreliable.  My attempts
> to use it have been unsuccessful so far.
> 
> Good luck,
> D.
> 
> 
> Shimik wrote:
>> 
>> Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or
>> unreliable.
>> According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one
>> might think it does.
>> If it does, how can I use it? 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18494476.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.