activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Closing Producers
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:18:14 GMT
Yep - all JMS managed resources (Connection,session,consumer,producer)  
behave the same way.

On 28 Jul 2008, at 12:09, rodih wrote:

>
> Thanks for the quick response. I will take your advice and will close
> resources explicitly.
> BTW, Are connections and session behave the same (are closing  
> resources the
> same as consumers/producers when finalized).
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> rajdavies wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28 Jul 2008, at 07:17, rodih wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> If I define a new producer or consumer as a local variable will it
>>> be closed
>>> (Closed + Garbage collected at some point) once the method returns?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Closing-Producers-tp18684689p18684689.html
>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>> Yes they should be if you use  ActiveMQ  - however I wouldn't
>> recommend it - as its specific to ActiveMQ  (not every JMS client  
>> will
>> do the same) - and gc is not very deterministic anyway.
>> It would be better to close them explicitly
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> http://open.iona.com/products/enterprise-activemq
>> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Closing-Producers-tp18684689p18688165.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


Mime
View raw message