activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Fernandez <joe.fernan...@ttmsolutions.com>
Subject Re: Does multicast transport exist?
Date Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:50:32 GMT

The second posting's thread states that reliable multicast is currently on
the todo list and that JGroups is not an option, because "JGroups is LGPL
and slow".

Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com



Shimik wrote:
> 
> According to these posts there are others who are looking for the same
> thing. I can't figure out if it exist or not.
> http://www.nabble.com/Reliable-Multicast-and-ActiveMQ-td17806853.html
> http://www.nabble.com/It-is-possible-to-configure-Broker-Client-to-use-reliable-UDP-protocol-for-Topics-and-TCP-IP-for-Queues--td17992071.html
> http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-ConnectionTransport--td18283185.html
> 
> 
> Maybe someone can shade light on this issue.
> 
> Shimi
> 
> 
> David Crisp wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Shimik,
>>     I'm looking for the same info, although I'm currently on 4.1.2.
>> When I did a code dive, I noticed that there are multicast connectors
>> (transport & network) although they appear to be unreliable.  My attempts
>> to use it have been unsuccessful so far.
>> 
>> Good luck,
>> D.
>> 
>> 
>> Shimik wrote:
>>> 
>>> Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or
>>> unreliable.
>>> According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one
>>> might think it does.
>>> If it does, how can I use it? 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18496329.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message