Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56721 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2008 14:03:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jun 2008 14:03:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 32548 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2008 14:03:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 32522 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2008 14:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 32511 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2008 14:03:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:03:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com designates 66.249.90.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.90.178] (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (66.249.90.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:02:30 +0000 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b32so979338ika.6 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:02:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=BG+ROHWovvnuWjelGjXcKXUB0XWla/Iwvk6vgYEDG6s=; b=oi4ryB0gbIUfBo4tdAM8JtGaMKJ9lWzP+2B+3ak9ee5XkpTqqU6n1+TjDJ4xyYMJ4i bqCYNNe1QhPCtY2oivTp5Zf+TOAe8r9jBmCrVdQacUaXsW/ORXxWCIPe3+5detouBbBR Y8fM19buLdWUpSybAKQ0qvGzwfsZntlcgv/XE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=HPd95vnBMfWYaNu92bpC+3JmYKTyiPLlSkgS0Ub2DwUb2fHX2rXY1Or152/5AR3AKt anZyvrJIU1ZhGtqN75zh3rt5gPASHCkx4r6ljkvNFLesu9I9BTjzAGPnZmJqI3siPtB7 x5dDDMkf3W/JbMtwlpzAjocbKRZiRKhl5ERCg= Received: by 10.210.41.14 with SMTP id o14mr4140863ebo.137.1214056967788; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.75? ( [86.133.82.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm4580311gve.4.2008.06.21.07.02.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4FFA6C32-7ED3-475E-8809-6FB8206E111E@gmail.com> From: Rob Davies To: users@activemq.apache.org In-Reply-To: <18035270.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924) Subject: Re: AMQ-1195 Get duplicate message after restart Topic subscriber. Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:02:43 +0100 References: <18035270.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 20 Jun 2008, at 19:41, rhealey wrote: > > Does anyone know if issue # AMQ-1195 is resolved and if so which > version it > was resolved in? It seems like I have the same problem in ActiveMQ > v 4.1.1 > but it looks like it does not happen in 5.1.0. I am confused by the > bug > report web page (found at https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1195 > ) My confusion comes from the web page showing the issue fix > version as > 5.2.0 but the status is still open. I would think the there should > be no > fix version if the bug is still open (open as in it is still a bug > that has > not been fixed). I am new to ActiveMQ and its bug tracking web site > so > please for give my ignorance to the obvious. > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-1195-Get-duplicate-message-after-restart-Topic-subscriber.-tp18035270p18035270.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > The status of the issue is open - the fix is the probable fix version for it. It doesn't mean its not fixed - just nobody has had a chance to verify it I'll mark the issue as fixed now though cheers, Rob http://open.iona.com/products/enterprise-activemq http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/