activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ In Jboss - Two Brokers Getting Created when using VM Protocol
Date Fri, 23 May 2008 07:09:10 GMT
Are you still explicitly registering a vm:// connector on the broker ?  
- you shouldn't need to

cheers,

Rob

On 23 May 2008, at 07:51, Kumar Ravella wrote:

>
> Hi ,,
>
> When i searched archives the suggested solution is to use the same  
> name for
> VM and Broker name in broker-config.xml ..
>
> If i use BrokerName as the logical name as same i get this error...
>
> javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException:
> org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=broker1,Type=Broker alre
> ady registered.
>
> ....
>
> Any advice ?
>
> Thanks
> Kumar
>
> Kumar Ravella wrote:
>>
>> Hi All ,
>>
>> There are two Brokers Getting Created while trying to use both VM  
>> and TCP
>> Protocols..
>>
>> I deployed ActiveMQ inside JBoss. - activemq-ra.rar.
>>
>> In my Brokre-Config i have made these setting for My Broker.
>>
>> Named it as Broker1 .
>> Persistence set to false.
>> And in transport Connector i have added both
>> tcp://localhost:61616
>> &
>> vm://myvmbroker
>>
>> But only when i try to use these two URL's in my code . It is  
>> creating two
>> brokers . Broker1 and myvmbroker
>>
>> Is this a normal Behavior .. ? Can't i make both connections  
>> running in
>> single Broker ?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kumar Ravella
>>
>
>
> -----
> Thanks,
> Kumar Ravella
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-In-Jboss---Two-Brokers-Getting-Created-when-using-VM-Protocol-tp17419178s2354p17419485.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message