activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sridhar2008 <activ...@komandur.com>
Subject Re: Store And Forward Request Reply
Date Thu, 22 May 2008 21:06:24 GMT

First off, given the info in your email, I think local broker gives you
isolation from changes to the remote broker (e.g., config changes,
unreachable for some time etc) and flexibility in future.

Joe: As per the following resolved issue:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-920

the NetworkConnector *should* be bidirectional.


ttmdev wrote:
> 
> If you decide to put it on the local broker, make sure the remote broker
> has a forwarding bridge back to the local broker. 
> 
> Joe 
> 
> 
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> 
>> either one works.. but putting on the local broker is typically
>> simpler and what is normally done.
>> 
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:06 PM, carloc <carlo_camer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to implement a request - reply message.
>>> I have two brokers, a local broker and a remote broker.
>>>
>>> My problem is I want to do a request reply but I'm not sure of whether
>>> to go
>>> directly to the remote broker and make a request there.
>>> Or to put a request on the local broker and use a networkconnector so
>>> that
>>> it should send the message to the remote router.
>>>
>>> What's the best approach to doing this?
>>>
>>> I'm using Camel btw.
>>>
>>> Thanks And Regards
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Store-And-Forward-Request-Reply-tp17412404s2354p17412404.html
>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>> 
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>> 
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://open.iona.com
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Store-And-Forward-Request-Reply-tp17412404s2354p17413480.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message