Return-Path: 
 <users-return-13728-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17687 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2008 19:21:46 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Apr 2008 19:21:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 60100 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2008 19:21:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60083 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2008 19:21:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@activemq.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.activemq.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60072 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2008 19:21:46 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:21:46 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:20:51 +0000
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156])
	by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <lists@nabble.com>)
	id 1JokW6-000480-IL
	for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:20:30 -0700
Message-ID: <16834776.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: toff <toffettg@lu.unisi.ch>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cyclic network of brokers: configuration and duplicates
In-Reply-To: <16834692.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Nabble-From: toffettg@lu.unisi.ch
References: <16834569.post@talk.nabble.com> <16834692.post@talk.nabble.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


Thank you Joe,

I just ran a test configuring servers (e.g. S1) with network connector:

<networkConnector name="S1NC" dynamicOnly="true" networkTTL="15"
uri="static://(tcp://node34:17702,tcp://node35:17703)"/>

The results still show massive message duplication as clients receive the
same message multiple times.
I think the (correct) behavior described in
http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers-configuration-limitation--td11639335s2354.html#a11639335
is due to the default TTL (set to 1).

My question is still whether cyclic topologies are supported and how to
avoid message duplication. Is there something I am not getting?

Thank you again for your time,

Gio




ttmdev wrote:
> 
> A static connector, having multiple IP addresses, will force the broker to
> connect to *all* the brokers whose IP addresses are listed in the
> connector. 
> 
> It is the client failover connector that, by default, randomly chooses one
> of the listed IP addresses/brokers (i.e., is more than one is provided).
> For example,
> 
> failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://remotehost:61616)
> 
> Joe
> Goto www.ttmsolutions.com for a free ActiveMQ user guide
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cyclic-network-of-brokers%3A-configuration-and-duplicates-tp16834569s2354p16834776.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.