Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <16467458.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: girakrok <paulofabiano@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Performance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi everybody,
I=C2=B4ve been testing activeMQ and it=C2=B4s pretty nice but I have a doub=
t: Is the
publish=C2=B4s performance different using ajax of directly on java?
I made a send and a receive messages application test. When I opened one
receive application in all browsers I have (FF, IE7, Safari 3, IE6) and jus=
t
one send application.
Sometimes the message appers very quickly on receive application, sometimes
one of them take a longe time to show the message, sometimes all of them
take a long time to show the message, etc.
I did the same test with the Portifolio application that comes with
activeMQ. I opened the PortifolioPublishServlet url and 4 o 5 (different)
browser windows with the portifolio HTML. They always update the dat very
quickly in every window.
So, I=C2=B4m a little worry about that. I don=C2=B4t feel myself safe enoug=
h to build
a big sender/receiver application to be used by thousands of people.

at,
Paulo
--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-tp16467458s=
2354p16467458.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.