Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1985 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2008 03:04:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2008 03:04:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 77538 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2008 03:04:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 77509 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2008 03:04:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 77500 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2008 03:04:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:04:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:03:42 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYBpJ-0001ZH-0q for users@activemq.apache.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:03:53 -0800 Message-ID: <15923373.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 19:03:53 -0800 (PST) From: jaya_srini To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: ActiveMq persistence delivery mode MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jya_srini@Hotmail.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi I am observing the following behaviour with ActiveMq 5.0 release and I was wondering if someone can tell me if this is expected or a bug I have a single broker with one producer and a durable subscriber. All on one machine. I am using a single Topic for publish and subscribe. The session is set to AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE and transacted is FALSE 1)When I publish a single message to the Topic from the producer in a PERSISTENT delivery mode I observe that 2 messages are sent and received. 2) When I publish a single message to the Topic from the producer in a NON_PERSISTENT delivery mode I observe that 1 message is sent and received In case of (1), Shouldn't the PERSISTENT delivery mode also send only 1 message? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMq-persistence-delivery-mode-tp15923373s2354p15923373.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.