activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From carbon60 <a...@sherman.ca>
Subject Re: Configuration Confusion
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:19:50 GMT


carbon60 wrote:
> 
> On 11-Mar-08, at 10:01 AM, James Strachan wrote:
>>> I need to configure my brokers to fault-tolerant in a two-node
>>> cluster. I'm configuring this directly inside Spring.
>>>
>>> I believe I need to use some form of auto-discovery, journaled
>>> persistence and clustering, but after reading most of the
>>> documentation I'm not clear on the exact setup I should be using.  
>>
>> So for clustering you need master/slave which ensures messages are
>> stored on different physical devices to protect against loss
>> http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html
> 
> So a network of brokers sharing the load is not appropriate in my  
> situation?
> 

>From the documentation, it seems like the peer:// URI is what I need? I
tried that in my current config and received a "This protocol does not
support being bound" IOException.

Thanks,

A.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Configuration-Confusion-tp15982539s2354p16009375.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message