Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchobot@vigilos.com designates
 216.231.46.252 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <47BDF832.1040206@vigilos.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:16:18 -0800
From: Ben Chobot <bchobot@vigilos.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue for ActiveMQ Server
References: <15617616.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <47BDC25D.8090601@vigilos.com>	 <15618683.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <47BDD660.8010805@vigilos.com>
 <7b15d610802211409ne6726e8j6baebb2a72abfaaf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7b15d610802211409ne6726e8j6baebb2a72abfaaf@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Well, I'm just starting to play with ActiveMQ myself, but just as a 
datapoint, I found that when writing every durable message to disk using 
the default Kaha store in 5.0, I maxed out at transferring a whopping 14 
40KB msgs/s. That's using a single, low-performance 7200RPM drive 
without write caching. That's slow, but it's also safe, and it's 
probably going to be fast enough for us.

If anybody has any hints on how to make things go faster while still 
being safe, I'd love to hear them.

Zao Liu wrote:
> Yeah, I do need to test for persistence, but firstly I wan to make sure the
> performance
> is good. The result for consuming durable messages make me disappointed. Is
> any specific
> configuration for consuming durable messages?  I do test for producing and
> consuming
> durable messages at the same time, the throughput is also get more than
> 3500/s for consuming
> messages. I don't think to consuming messages which has been saved to store
> will be so slow,
> only 50 msgs/s.
>
>