Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <15602222.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:19:48 -0800 (PST)
From: semog <e.semog@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: C# NMS questions.
In-Reply-To: <15594276.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <15508046.post@talk.nabble.com> <fpfpl0$qft$2@ger.gmane.org>
 <15594276.post@talk.nabble.com>


Hi Scott,

The connect/reconnect scenario is implementation specific, which means it'll
be manual.  I've done something similar to what you are trying to do, but
the re-connect is quiet since my application doesn't have any user
interface.  Some applications may not want to re-connect, others may want to
send e-mail notifications.  It varies.

Let me know if you want any specific suggestions.

- Jim


Scott@Egistix wrote:
> 
>> Have you tried to test this scenario? I believe you should get some 
>> exception when connection is broken.
> 
> Yes, it does...but recovery is manual...
> ie.
> 
> Upon failure, I have to start a timer, and try and reconnect, upon
> success, I then have to recreate my session and all my consumers, seems
> cumbersome, I guess I was naively hoping for a better way.
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/C--NMS-questions.-tp15508046s2354p15602222.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.