Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <14450031.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:18:36 -0800 (PST)
From: EricMeena <mauvv165@yahoo.fr>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: ActiveMQ v5.0.0 Performance issue
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


I was to a point where the AMQ performance was really impressive, but when I
added some AMQ message storage configurations, the performance becomes
questionable, I think I am combining wrong properties:

I have two JMS clients(producer & receiver), I am sending about 10,000
messages (500KB each) and receiving them on the other side.
This is what I am using:
- MS Windows XP Pro, Version 2002, SP2, Core(TM)2 CPU, T 7200 @ 2.00GHz,
1.66 GHz, 1.99 GB of RAM
- ActiveMQ v5
- Sun JVM 5
- My JMS clients use a spring JmsTemplate and a listenerContainer. (For
connectionFactory, I am using this:
org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory). I am using a queue.
- I am configuring the message storage within the default AMQ broker
configuration file (activemq.xml) as follows:

    <persistenceAdapter>
        <amqPersistenceAdapter directory="C:/ActiveMQ/ActiveMQ_Storage"
maxFileLength="1000mb"
directoryArchive="C:/ActiveMQ/ActiveMQ_Storage_Archive"
archiveDataLogs="true" syncOnWrite="true"/>
    </persistenceAdapter>

Problem:

Everything was fine until I added the sycOnWrite="true", I could send and
consume up 17 messages per second. With this prop added, the sending itself
becomes a little slow, but reading gets worse. The sender finishes its job
while the consumer is not even half way done. This led to a performance of 1
message per second.
I added few properties to fix this (like persistentIndex and indexBinSize),
none helped the situation.

Any idea? What is wrong here?


Thanks in advance. 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-v5.0.0-Performance-issue-tp14450031s2354p14450031.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.