Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56738 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2007 19:19:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2007 19:19:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 86929 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2007 19:19:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 86602 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2007 19:19:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 86593 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2007 19:19:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:19:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:19:09 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J5Qv6-00022N-Tm for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:19:00 -0800 Message-ID: <14443027.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:19:00 -0800 (PST) From: tpounds To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: NetworkTTL and Duplex Problem In-Reply-To: <7DCAF802-695B-4841-93F9-BC54DD466DC9@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: trevor.pounds@gmail.com References: <14428941.post@talk.nabble.com> <14429356.post@talk.nabble.com> <14432231.post@talk.nabble.com> <14439928.post@talk.nabble.com> <7DCAF802-695B-4841-93F9-BC54DD466DC9@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks guys! I will try this out soon. -Trevor rajdavies wrote: > > hi Joe this issue has been fixed recently: > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1521 > > cheers, > > Rob > On Dec 20, 2007, at 4:29 PM, ttmdev wrote: > >> >> Well, I pulled out my test environment for this and gave it a go >> against the >> just-released AMQ 5.0 and things wouldn't work. This is my >> configuration. >> >> [producer]-->[broker 1]<-->[broker 2]-->[broker 3]<--[consumer] >> >> The messages would be forwarded from broker 1 to 2, but not 3. >> >> So, just for kicks I pulled out the duplex="true" on broker 1's cfg >> file to >> get this. >> >> [producer]-->[broker 1]-->[broker 2]-->[broker 3]<--[consumer] >> >> And it now works. It seems duplex=true is the fly-in-the-ointment. >> >> I have networkTTL=2 set for brokers 1 and 2. Broker 3 is just >> listening. >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> >> >> tpounds wrote: >>> >>> Is this configuration used on all 3 machines? >>> >>> >>> ttmdev wrote: >>>> >>>> Here's an example that works for me w/a similar 3 broker topology. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> name="twowaybridge" >>>> uri="static:(tcp://remotehost:61616)" >>>> networkTTL="2" >>>> duplex="true"/> >>>> >>>> >>>> If you haven't done so already, try moving up to AMQ 5.0. >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/NetworkTTL-and-Duplex-Problem-tp14428941s2354p14439928.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NetworkTTL-and-Duplex-Problem-tp14428941s2354p14443027.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.