Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <14384479.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:43:57 -0800 (PST)
From: JS75 <jean_su@aboveE.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Journal is locked
In-Reply-To: <14379258.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <14375869.post@talk.nabble.com> <14379258.post@talk.nabble.com>


First, thank you for your apply~

I tried to assign name to each embedded broker.=20
And these twn connections starts successfully, however, they do not work as
I wish!

As URI as tcp://localhost:61616, producers send messages and consumers
receive messages.
After assigning names, they seemd to work without any relationship.

Is there any thing I can do to make embedded VM broker as embedded TCP
broker?

BTW, I tried to upgrade activeMQ to 5.0, and I found this exception in
console
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:=20
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport.getDestination()Ljavax/j=
ms/Destination;

Have I misses to include any lib?

Sincerely,
Jean


ttmdev wrote:
>=20
> Try assigning different names to your two embedded brokers. For example,=
=20
>=20
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory =3D
>   new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(vm://clientbroker);=20
>=20
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory =3D
>   new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(vm://serverbroker);=20
>=20
> Joe
>=20
>=20
>=20
> JS75 wrote:
>>=20
>> Dear Sirs:
>>=20
>> As a neophyte of activeMQ, I encountered some tasks, and please help me
>> to solve them >"<!
>>=20
>> I tried to embedded one broker into my connections -=20
>>           producer (ClientSide) and consumer (ServerSide) separately in
>> one JVM.
>>   =20
>>     ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory =3D
>> =09=09      new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(vm://localhost);
>>=20
>>=20
>> However, when I started these two connections, the latter one has above
>> messages in cosole
>>=20
>>    org.apache.activemq.store.DefaultPersistenceAdapterFactory
>> createJournal
>>    =E8=B3=87=E8=A8=8A: Journal is locked... waiting 10 seconds for the j=
ournal to be
>> unlocked.
>>=20
>> Unless did I close the former connection (usually Producer connection),
>> the latter broker started (Consumer connection received)?
>> But I wish each of them can work in pararrel as TCP can do?=20
>> Did I make any mistake or forget to do any configurations?
>>=20
>> Sincerely,
>> Jean
>>=20
>=20
>=20

--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Journal-is-locked-tp143=
75869s2354p14384479.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.