activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Mittler <>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ thoughts
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:57:25 GMT
Hey James,
I've captured the details here

Looks like the C++ producer's response correlator timed out when  
waiting for a response for a sent bytes message (this timeout defaults  
to 3 seconds).

It may simply be that the app was bogging down the machine (win32) and  
the default timeout wasn't sufficient.

Is there a flow control that gets imposed on producers that are  
flooding the broker with messages?  If so, could you point me to where  
this is done in the Java client?  It may be that we already have this  
flow control implemented - I know Tim has been working on  
compatibility with the 5.0.0 broker.


On Dec 17, 2007, at 6:01 AM, James Strachan wrote:

> On 17/12/2007, Hellweek <> wrote:
>> When performing the test with C# consumers the  CPP producers fail.
>> The CPP consumers do not fail with C# producers.
> Ah great, thanks. This has been a long thread, forgive me if you've
> already answered this but how do they fail? Do they core dump? Getting
> the stack trace could help.
> Am wondering if its the new producer flow control messages that are
> not being handled by CPP?
> -- 
> James
> -------
> Open Source Integration

View raw message