activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hellweek <bwins...@tfutures.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ thoughts
Date Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:39:18 GMT

I had no real need for a JAVA API as such it was not included in our
evaluation.

James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> On 11/12/2007, Hellweek <bwinslow@tfutures.com> wrote:
>>
>> I pulled the 5.0 down yesterday.  As well as the 5.0 RC1, RC2, RC3
> 
> Cool thanks. BTW in your previous mail detailing your issues I was a
> little confused over what clients were being used - were you seeing
> these issues purely with the C++ client, or did you see the exact same
> problems with the Java client too?
> 
> -- 
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
> 
> Open Source Integration
> http://open.iona.com
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-thoughts-tp14262131s2354p14295132.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message