activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From marlet <...@freenet.de>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ vs ?
Date Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:48:13 GMT


James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> On 7/21/07, Chris Neal <cneal@hayes-lemmerz.com> wrote:
> 
>> Let alone the message that was in the queue. (Even if persistant
>> delivery)
>> is selected... So without setting up a CLUSTER of ActiveMQ servers.   How
>> do
>> I get the JMS server to maintain the state of the messages?  (i.e. Don't
>> loose them)
> 
> You don't loose them; the destinations don't appear by default until
> you produce/consume from them.
> 

You don't loose the messages, thats right, but only if you add the field
'JMSDeliveryMode=persistent' to the POST.
Without this, your message will be non-persistent.
Unfortunately, the documentation doesn't tell you about that (at least I
couldn't find
it anywhere).

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-REST-and-persistance--tp11717696s2354p14291892.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message