activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Viswanath Durbha <Viswanath.Dur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: High availability and persistency
Date Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:30:16 GMT

I just had a question.Is it not possible to enable persistence in the
configuration of the broker, but actually not persist any message? In that
case, we'll have the advantage of HA with the slave coming up automatically,
and also have the advantage of having multiple slaves. These two are the
major advantages one can get over a Pure Master/Slave configuration. Also,
are there any downsides of this approach?

Thanks,
Viswanath

James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> On 09/12/2007, hagai <hagai@liveperson.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am trying to use the "Shared File System Master Slave" configuration,
>> and
>> I have a few questions:
>>
>> 1. I don't want to use persistency. Is that possible using this
>> configuration? I am asking this since the example in
>> http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html uses the
>> persistencyAdapter's properties for configuring the shared file for the
>> master-slave.
> 
> Shared File/Database based Master Slave only work for persistent
> messaging.
> 
> If you don't want persistence, try Pure Master Slave (or even just
> failover on the client).
> -- 
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
> 
> Open Source Integration
> http://open.iona.com
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/High-availability-and-persistency-tp14240560s2354p14249528.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message