Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <13828261.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:59:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Boyes <paul@paulboyes.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: [BULK]  Re: Network of brokers
In-Reply-To: <70712294829A6941937BAF3C2F94B4AD88F404@MSWLEX01.MSWL.COM.AU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <13827353.post@talk.nabble.com> <13828016.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <70712294829A6941937BAF3C2F94B4AD88F404@MSWLEX01.MSWL.COM.AU>


Thanks for the response.  I greatly appreciate it.  This is one of the main
issues we are having as well.  In addition, we are seeing duplicate messages
in some cases when brokers are reestablished.  

This feature is extremely important to us as well.  

Thanks,

Paul


Steven Dalton-2 wrote:
> 
> 
> I've also tried to a get a network of brokers running using activemq
> 4.1.1.  
> 
> The messages send and receive fine until I start taking down and
> bringing back up the brokers.  The connections between the brokers are
> not re-established.
> 
> I have been watching this list for a while and have noticed a number of
> people with the same problem but no solutions have been put forward.
> 
> I consider this feature critical to the use of the product.
> 
> Steven
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Boyes [mailto:paul@paulboyes.com] 
> Sent: Monday, 19 November 2007 3:53 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [BULK] Re: Network of brokers
> Importance: Low
> 
> 
> I too am very interested in finding some case studies or at least
> experiences
> that other folks have recently had with Network of Brokers config/use.
> If
> this works, it would suit our needs well.  However, I have been having
> various problems with it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> LikeEvents wrote:
>> 
>> Can someone point me to a case study of having a cluster of brokers.
>> I want to put lets say a set of brokers in a cluster in one data
> center
>> and similarly in others.
>> 
>> How does persistence work in ActiveMQ 5.0, can you have durable
> messaging
>> without a database in the backend. (Through replication.)
>> 
>> 
>> When is Active MQ 5.0 supposed to be released.
>> Thanks
>> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-tf4833130s2354.html#a13828016
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-tf4833130s2354.html#a13828261
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.