We had the same problems using AMQ-4.0.2 as well. We were able to reduce them
by applying the patch described in
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-961, which only seems to have
been applied to trunk, but not yet to the 4.1.x branch.
Regards,
Holger
Steven Dalton-2 wrote:
>
>
> I've also tried to a get a network of brokers running using activemq
> 4.1.1.
>
> The messages send and receive fine until I start taking down and
> bringing back up the brokers. The connections between the brokers are
> not re-established.
>
> I have been watching this list for a while and have noticed a number of
> people with the same problem but no solutions have been put forward.
>
> I consider this feature critical to the use of the product.
>
> Steven
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Boyes [mailto:paul@paulboyes.com]
> Sent: Monday, 19 November 2007 3:53 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [BULK] Re: Network of brokers
> Importance: Low
>
>
> I too am very interested in finding some case studies or at least
> experiences
> that other folks have recently had with Network of Brokers config/use.
> If
> this works, it would suit our needs well. However, I have been having
> various problems with it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> LikeEvents wrote:
>>
>> Can someone point me to a case study of having a cluster of brokers.
>> I want to put lets say a set of brokers in a cluster in one data
> center
>> and similarly in others.
>>
>> How does persistence work in ActiveMQ 5.0, can you have durable
> messaging
>> without a database in the backend. (Through replication.)
>>
>>
>> When is Active MQ 5.0 supposed to be released.
>> Thanks
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-tf4833130s2354.html#a13828016
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-tf4833130s2354.html#a13834429
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|