Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.235 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=J1QDAtzpl5n3BAS9nvXNhGB5BiCdTCIciWXUn+XSniD1O9NxvG7YU6GEBcNiV2v/k+UwYu9yahIae0zvftVy3A+OuWGWHijZX/D1oZvxaoR1NlsNdDJ/Agq3CcF4yhb3KCZ5jTw6pIdDn1euGMdKtNlbRWlUm1QsI1XH8r1FQGA=
Message-ID: <ec6e67fd0710030950n24215e1ejfd8501985a010fe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:50:54 +0100
From: "James Strachan" <james.strachan@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning guide available...
In-Reply-To: <12932501.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ec6e67fd0606160449o685f420ct28d346ebb127b128@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4903182.post@talk.nabble.com> <12810128.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <12932501.post@talk.nabble.com>

There's a copy here...

http://open.iona.com/wiki/display/ProdInfo/FUSE+Message+Broker+Performance+Tuning+Guide

On 28/09/2007, Paul Ortiz <myles_na_gopaleen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, it would be really nice to have a look at this document.
>
> P.
>
>
> JigarP wrote:
> >
> > Hi Karthick,
> >
> >    I am not able to see this performance guide anywhere. can you provide
> > me link using which i can check out performance tip.
> >
> >    i have gone through this site but it is showing AMQ issue tracker page.
> >
> > http://devzone.logicblaze.com/site/how-to-tune-activemq.html
> >
> > J
> >
> >
> > skarthik wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks James,
> >>
> >> The guide is useful. I have a couple of questions.
> >>
> >>  Suppose we really don't need persistence as we don't use durable
> >> subcribers, would there be any other reason to use persitent messages?
> >>
> >>  I got the impression from various posts, that enabling/using
> >> perisistence, optimizes the activeMQ server memory usage in case of large
> >> volume of messages, as the message would not be kept in memory once it is
> >> check-pointed.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> karthik
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Tuning-guide-available...-tf1797775s2354.html#a12932501
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com