Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45810 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2007 15:51:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2007 15:51:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 82609 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2007 15:51:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 82579 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2007 15:51:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 82563 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2007 15:51:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 08:51:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:52:19 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ISECM-0002A2-MX for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 08:50:46 -0700 Message-ID: <12463870.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:50:46 -0700 (PDT) From: ttmdev To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveMQ vs TIBCO RV In-Reply-To: <12444949.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: joe.fernandez@ttmsolutions.com References: <12444949.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You may also want to consider comparing TIBCO EMS with AMQ, since EMS is TIB's implementation of the JMS. Joe saleem145 wrote: > > Hello, > > I know TIBCO RV in detail but haven't used ActiveMQ. My question is what > is the difference between the two. Are they functionally equivalent?? What > is the difference in bandwidth, etc. > > Saleem > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-vs-TIBCO-RV-tf4366107s2354.html#a12463870 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.