activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From saleem145 <smukh...@taconiccap.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ vs TIBCO RV
Date Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:40:32 GMT

So can I presume with Active MQ I can publish and subscribe thousands of
messages per second??

Which is the most widely used open source bus??

Saleem



James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> On 9/2/07, saleem145 <smukhtar@taconiccap.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I know TIBCO RV in detail but haven't used ActiveMQ. My question is what
>> is
>> the difference between the two. Are they functionally equivalent?? What
>> is
>> the difference in bandwidth, etc.
> 
> Here's a quick list off the top of my head. We should probably hack
> this list some more then add it to the FAQ...
> 
> * RV is not open source :)
> * RV doesn't support JMS (see TibCo EMS for that which is a different
> product entirely)
> * RV uses multicast to communicate; ActiveMQ uses multicast for
> discovery then uses TCP for reliable communication.
> * RV only really supports a time window based persistence log on the
> producer side; ActiveMQ supports a federated network of brokers that
> can do short term, long term and spooling based persistence
> * ActiveMQ supports master/slave for replicated broker side
> persistence. With RV if the disk dies on the producer, you've lost
> messages.
> * ActiveMQ does queues properly & well :)
> * ActiveMQ is pure Java so you can embed the broker in any JMS client
> to remove a network / process hop and reduce latency
> 
> 
> ActiveMQ and TibCo EMS are fairly similar products though; apart from
> that ActiveMQ is open source and pure Java (and so can be embedded in
> any JMS connection).
> 
> -- 
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-vs-TIBCO-RV-tf4366107s2354.html#a12470337
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message