Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1784 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2007 18:18:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2007 18:18:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 62708 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2007 18:18:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 62685 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2007 18:18:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 62676 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2007 18:18:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:18:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of erharold@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.179] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:18:29 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so1649324pyb for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:18:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=hYk6GQnHgLh2M1ZF1eM++FyeSsmY92uYR6a5XIz5bfm5PmHW4zPTWuvYRYZhqREi9GT/OJjGA+OFVYmuJcZvqEfMMi4gYM5jrqZ/8rZLZWsePrxKoV2bFqyGOyYUyeg0q/kjpcl6A0Q6CATxIQBqwIB51l9zKXBy63MdA+90X5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=p7oele+xCn7+stRlvOTOan4uy/zw9sL0+ev4Dc9NJsghlauelQoGapvxFP3HQBqCBo5xVqZp/bYLJcwAgFfqRpW5ccsurwTEQQMl0/QCMcMlJ3Shp3tAEwVNG9iRArr0ymSrrIJngSJwmZZXYuaRGIQFFw6l26sgQLy/rvZt7/8= Received: by 10.65.200.8 with SMTP id c8mr6077099qbq.1187979488214; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.204.12 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49aa580c0708241118p2f2ce870v20efc37fffb2383d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:18:08 -0400 From: "Elliotte Harold" To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: ActiveMQ or Qpid? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_185613_13286895.1187979488178" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_185613_13286895.1187979488178 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Has anyone tried out Apache qpid yet? http://incubator.apache.org/qpid/ Any war stories to report? I was wondering how it stacked up against ActiveMQ. Any particular reasons one might choose one over the other? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold erharold@gmail.com ------=_Part_185613_13286895.1187979488178--