Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54400 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2007 05:35:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2007 05:35:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 46336 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2007 05:35:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46091 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2007 05:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46069 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2007 05:35:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:35:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.142.175.113] (HELO correo.infobiok.com) (212.142.175.113) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:35:11 -0700 Received: (qmail 27109 invoked by uid 1008); 17 Jul 2007 07:28:24 +0200 Received: from 192.168.5.80 by correo (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.90.2/3321. spamassassin: 3.0.3. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(192.168.5.80):. Processed in 0.040263 secs); 17 Jul 2007 05:28:24 -0000 X-Antivirus-INFOBIOK-Mail-From: egoitz@ramattack.net via correo X-Antivirus-INFOBIOK: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(192.168.5.80):. Processed in 0.040263 secs Process 27102) Received: from unknown (HELO correo.infobiok.com) (egoitz@ramattack.net@192.168.5.80) by 0 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2007 07:28:24 +0200 Received: from 80.59.36.111 (SquirrelMail authenticated user egoitz@ramattack.net) by correo.infobiok.com with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:36:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <28647.80.59.36.111.1184650571.squirrel@correo.infobiok.com> In-Reply-To: References: <17553.80.59.36.111.1184590779.squirrel@correo.infobiok.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:36:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Apache 2.2 and file-descriptors From: egoitz@ramattack.net To: users@activemq.apache.org Cc: rajdavies@gmail.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sorry Rob, But this is Sun updates site... are you telling me in an update that solves this issue? do you know how could you solve this issue in Linux or other unix like environments? Because I have read this affects to Linux too.. Have a nice day! Bye. > Its a while since I've administered sun boxes - I'd recommend you go > here: http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=tous to try get > enlightenment ;) > > cheers, > > Rob > > On Jul 16, 2007, at 1:59 PM, egoitz@ramattack.net wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are running a SunOS 5.9 box, with apache 2.2.4... and we have >> run out >> of inodes, is any possible way for increasing file descriptors without >> having stdio issues or other like issues? it's a production machine >> and >> I'm playing with my job :(... lol >> >> could you tell me please if I could increase file descriptors on this >> machine for this proccess without any problem?? or if there the >> same known >> limitations as for apache 2.0 ? >> >> Thanks a lot mates! >> Bye. >> > >