Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44746 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2007 12:38:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2007 12:38:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 61964 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2007 12:37:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 61927 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2007 12:37:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 61918 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2007 12:37:56 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:37:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:37:52 -0700 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IBVG7-0007Yj-C9 for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:37:31 -0700 Message-ID: <11688109.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:37:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Syer To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Database Locking issues In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: david_syer@hotmail.com References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How do you disable the exclusive lock? Ideally a solution involving Spring configuration works best for me. I am trying to do the same thing as the original post (where the platform was pretty obviously HSQLDB, by the way). I guess the HSQLDB support isn't as complete as it might be? Or Am I not configuring the adapter correctly? vm://localhost James.Strachan wrote: > > So you could disable the exclusive lock we use in ActiveMQ; or if you > let us know the database you are using and the correct SQL dialect for > you database we could patch the code to use the correct SQL. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Database-Locking-issues-tf2617111s2354.html#a11688109 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.