Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49899 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 06:23:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2007 06:23:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 24354 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2007 06:11:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 24317 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2007 06:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 24308 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2007 06:11:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:11:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:11:53 -0700 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I6h2S-0003ct-PG for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:11:32 -0700 Message-ID: <11459288.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:11:32 -0700 (PDT) From: TiredAndEmotional To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Blocking consumers not consuming immediately In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: stevesiller@yahoo.co.uk References: <11428816.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org James.Strachan wrote: > > Which version are you using? > I'm using version 4.1. Also, except where noted in my original post, all broker parameters are set to their default (i.e. all bar prefetch....all queues are NON_PERSISTANT). Apart from the connections and queue mentioned, there are another 12 connections to the broker 5 or 6 queues and a topic, but these only send/receive messages irregularly and the workflows involved are trivial. The machine on which the broker resides never uses more than 2 or 3% of CPU resources. Many thanks for the response. Apologies for forgetting the most important piece of information! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Blocking-consumers-not-consuming-immediately-tf4023758s2354.html#a11459288 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.