Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of nathan.mittler@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.239 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=cpDLD0Y06MHzlKofOdvwrXESPXDiQK1IOLHqZhGnof0jDDuTItJhib4fvSjPksnxIkB8ITVCJqDukf7u94o7MyVT8XQ9QzcEWW7EzG+kTSGkJDsaOLnzGk/aSpNfL9F87PkWAsyxaZouFotXxWLTPl1pSeuqbfOwOwzfJUEyEZ4=
Message-ID: <8a6feb940706070426g457010fdn5d886798ff488cb5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 07:26:09 -0400
From: "Nathan Mittler" <nathan.mittler@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Integrating C++ Client with MDB
In-Reply-To: <8a6feb940706070423pceb0d5ay973e60d0b9d73508@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_61828_20756488.1181215569923"
References: <10993863.post@talk.nabble.com> <10995054.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <20070606192453.GA30676@dogbert.sdsl.sun.ac.za>
	 <10995796.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <20070606203055.GA31746@dogbert.sdsl.sun.ac.za>
	 <10996901.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <20070606215148.GA597@dogbert.sdsl.sun.ac.za>
	 <10998238.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <011501c7a8db$99c5cdd0$1a29e60a@OCTODAT>
	 <8a6feb940706070423pceb0d5ay973e60d0b9d73508@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_61828_20756488.1181215569923
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

BTW, have you tried making a Java client that does not use JNDI?  You should
have the same result as using the C++ client.  Perhaps you could simplify
your problem by cooking up a simple Java client and eliminating C++
altogether.

On 6/7/07, Nathan Mittler <nathan.mittler@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That would be my guess (use "topic/SciTegic") ... the problem of creating
> topics vs using pre-existing ones should not be a non-issue.  All
> topics/queues in ActiveMQ are dynamic, so it doesn't matter how you create
> them (from the client-side or server-side).  So long as the names are the
> same, it should work.
>
> On 6/7/07, Desire ATANGA <datanga@octo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > > destination = session->createTopic( "TOPIC.SciTegic" ); // IS THIS THE
> > > RIGHT NAME TO USE?
> >
> > Have you tried to this?
> >
> > destination = session->createTopic( "topic/SciTegic" );
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Desire
> >
> >
>

------=_Part_61828_20756488.1181215569923--