Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69110 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2007 04:55:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2007 04:55:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 43333 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2007 04:55:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 43305 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2007 04:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 43296 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2007 04:55:36 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:55:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.113.193.83] (HELO ly.sdf.com) (216.113.193.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:55:32 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ly.sdf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA71228390 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:55:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -3.937 X-Spam-Level: Received: from ly.sdf.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ly.sdf.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfCAuGJi7915 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:55:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ly.sdf.com (ly.sdf.com [216.113.193.83]) by ly.sdf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E339A22838F; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:55:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:55:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: users@activemq.apache.org Cc: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <29174824.3971182488133868.JavaMail.root@ly.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: UDP buffer problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [64.251.80.98] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.937 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.462, BAYES_00=-2.599] ----- "James Strachan" wrote: > So we need a working reliable layer on top of UDP which is capable of > handling re-requests of missing packets etc. The current code is work ... I think that is called TCP. Why UDP at all? Is this for multicasting? Otherwise, I can't see any reason why not to use TCP? Redelivery of missed packets when multicasting is fairly onerous area. Tom