From users-return-9488-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Wed Jun 13 14:05:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52927 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 14:05:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 14:05:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 71485 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2007 14:05:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 71452 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2007 14:05:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 71442 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2007 14:05:47 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:05:47 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of erharold@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.182] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:05:43 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so368619pyh for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:05:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=DgyaFQJIqRxdMZAiuhtQmkSCzQPeMxKmSfSLUixXpj2leIyC8A6JHijV4unLR/dFe7JYc29z0mHDSLOjtaWFWZyt/iRBbILM9uJmNDQLn4l39/QV2O6kwSsh51Y8WlW/IpeT1GT9RErYGY9neC5/eTteZCGo7Rg3i3K54LoqWKg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=hbXHqktnl+CPbSadtQ5zAVnhjrH4WhEarL8dS7GyFEFARUJKU7HV2s212gj93Eq4iAxUnChPutP+0uvfsQHzPT77OR3gmSYvH0ppBzBn9PWOtUPZer+Wfdogu1pv2HEQI6VHj9p48ijkiKZGfIo2HB2Xw4D20nTHhYh2c6C4bjg= Received: by 10.65.113.17 with SMTP id q17mr1130832qbm.1181743522476; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.204.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49aa580c0706130705g5d1951c6jd39caf6c54939611@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:05:22 -0400 From: "Elliotte Harold" To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: concurrent.util backport MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21899_30187568.1181743522453" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_21899_30187568.1181743522453 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Why does ActiveMQ require the backport of java.concurrent.util? I'm working in Java 5 and would be happy to use the regular, bundled version of java.util.concurrent, which I suspect works better anyway. Is there any chance to get a version of ActiveMQ that removes this external dependency? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold erharold@gmail.com ------=_Part_21899_30187568.1181743522453--