Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55498 invoked from network); 14 May 2007 09:26:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2007 09:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 85685 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 09:27:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 85416 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 09:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 85403 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2007 09:27:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 02:27:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 02:26:55 -0700 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HnWp8-00043T-NJ for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 02:26:34 -0700 Message-ID: <10600449.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 02:26:34 -0700 (PDT) From: PieterN To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Combining MasterSlave and network of brokers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: servicemix@internethoofdkantoor.nl X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I want to combine a master/slave technology with a network of brokers. The idea is to have a central master/slave combination, and a remote ActiveMQ server connected to the master/slave. The Master/Slave should always be available, messages posted to the remote server are less important, that is, there is no need for HA there. Is this setup possible? My idea was to create a master/slave combination, and have them both connect to the remote server with a configuration. The remote server connects to the master/slave combination with a with a failover:// protocol. This seems to work fine if all servers are up & running, but if I bring down the master server, the remote server gets error messages like 'Unexpected local command'. The slave server seems to take over the master just fine. Here are the relevant parts of the configuration: Master: Slave: Remote: Is it possible what I want? Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks. With kind regards, Pieter -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Combining-MasterSlave-and-network-of-brokers-tf3751194s2354.html#a10600449 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.