Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89478 invoked from network); 3 May 2007 05:54:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2007 05:54:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 17842 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 05:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 17817 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 05:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 17808 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2007 05:54:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 22:54:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 22:54:36 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjUGd-0003ib-K3 for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 22:54:15 -0700 Message-ID: <10299368.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:54:15 -0700 (PDT) From: notacrime To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: MSMQ / ActiveMQ Bridge? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: notacrime@gmail.com References: <10295941.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was hoping you'd say - 'just run widget x!' I think we'll end up wrapping NMS in a service, with a configuration file to define which queue on the MSMQ side should talk to which queue on the AMQ side, and so on. Having researched MSMQ for most of the day today it's very sad to see that it provides very little interoperability outside the Microsoft space. James.Strachan wrote: > > On 5/2/07, notacrime wrote: >> >> We're faced with having to integrate with a Microsoft application that >> uses >> MSMQ as it's messaging bus. We use AMQ, and STOMP, and would like to >> create >> a bridge between the MSMQ queues and AMQ. Is there an easy way to do >> this? > > NMS does have support for MSMQ (though it could use a little work to > polish some of the rough edges) so an NMS bridge could be created to > go from one NMS provider to another (e.g. MSMQ <-> ActiveMQ or MSMQ > <-> Stomp etc.) > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MSMQ---ActiveMQ-Bridge--tf3683635s2354.html#a10299368 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.