Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37474 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2007 21:58:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2007 21:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 87239 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2007 21:58:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 87223 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2007 21:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 87214 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2007 21:58:25 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:58:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:58:18 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HbkpB-0006yW-RQ for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:57:57 -0700 Message-ID: <9949215.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT) From: cmaxo To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: c++ acknowledge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: cmaxo@engineer.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It looks like when clone() is called in ActiveMQConsumer::receive() in the activemq-cpp library the cloned message does not have an ack handler. Is that a bug or as designed? I can get the cloned msg to have an ack handler by calling beforeMessageIsConsumed and passing it in as the parameter but I'm wondering if I'm using the api correctly. Thanks for a great product, Corey -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/c%2B%2B-acknowledge-tf3562225s2354.html#a9949215 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.