activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: temporary queue in store and forward environment
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:19:24 GMT
On 4/25/07, DavidR <david.rosenstark@corp.idt.net> wrote:
>
> >If you want clustering (high availability and failover of brokers) you
> >really should use Master/Slave instead of Networks...
>
> >http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html
>
> Thanks for your quick response.  We like the jdbc master slave but were
> concerned about the CPU hit we saw on our database (oracle). The pure
> masterslave seems to be problematic in terms of loss of messages if primary
> goes down, so we thought store and forward would be best. Are we
> misunderstanding something here?

Yes. Store and forward does not replicate messages at all; a message
is owned by only one broker at any point in time.

So a store and forward network is not too different from running a
single broker from a reliability perpective.

-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message