activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Master/Slave Configuration with Memory Persistence?
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:20:20 GMT

yes it should - just set the persistence to false in the  
configuration:  see http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html -  
last item. When persistence is false, the ActiveMQ broker uses an in  
memory store implementation instead

cheers,

Rob

http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/



On 27 Apr 2007, at 06:25, Franz Garsombke wrote:

>
> We are setting up a master/slave configuration with ActiveMQ. Our
> object-relational-mapping framework uses a topic to synchronize cache
> changes across VMs. These messages do not need to be persisted into a
> database or file store. I was wondering if a master/slave broker
> configuration could be set up that didn't need the JDBC persistence  
> adapter?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Franz Garsombke
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave- 
> Configuration-with-Memory-Persistence--tf3655809s2354.html#a10213401
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message