activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Franz Garsombke <fgarsom...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Master/Slave Configuration with Memory Persistence?
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:48:32 GMT

That is simple enough :). I had assumed from the documentation that since
master/slave didn't mention memory persistence that is was only possible
with jdbcPersistence or a shared file system.

Thanks.

Franz


rajdavies wrote:
> 
> 
> yes it should - just set the persistence to false in the  
> configuration:  see http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html -  
> last item. When persistence is false, the ActiveMQ broker uses an in  
> memory store implementation instead
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Rob
> 
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> On 27 Apr 2007, at 06:25, Franz Garsombke wrote:
> 
>>
>> We are setting up a master/slave configuration with ActiveMQ. Our
>> object-relational-mapping framework uses a topic to synchronize cache
>> changes across VMs. These messages do not need to be persisted into a
>> database or file store. I was wondering if a master/slave broker
>> configuration could be set up that didn't need the JDBC persistence  
>> adapter?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Franz Garsombke
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave- 
>> Configuration-with-Memory-Persistence--tf3655809s2354.html#a10213401
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-Configuration-with-Memory-Persistence--tf3655809s2354.html#a10219398
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message