activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Franz Garsombke <fgarsom...@yahoo.com>
Subject Master/Slave Configuration with Memory Persistence?
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:25:38 GMT

We are setting up a master/slave configuration with ActiveMQ. Our
object-relational-mapping framework uses a topic to synchronize cache
changes across VMs. These messages do not need to be persisted into a
database or file store. I was wondering if a master/slave broker
configuration could be set up that didn't need the JDBC persistence adapter?

Thanks in advance.

Franz Garsombke 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-Configuration-with-Memory-Persistence--tf3655809s2354.html#a10213401
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message