Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71837 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2007 19:57:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2007 19:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 45756 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2007 19:57:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45737 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2007 19:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45728 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2007 19:57:52 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:57:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:57:41 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRZb7-00011T-7x for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:57:21 -0700 Message-ID: <9482155.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:57:21 -0700 (PDT) From: garima015 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [Spam: 5.0] Broker issue regarding queue In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: garima_indiya@rediffmail.com References: <9477113.post@talk.nabble.com> <9479510.post@talk.nabble.com> <9481726.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org when i am manually shutting down the broker 1 my application is getting connected to second broker but console of first broker is showing exception.It does not have a clean exit WARN DemandForwardingBridge - Caught exception from local start java.io.IOException: Transport disposed. Is it a kind of problem. How much usually application should take to resume the connection to second broker upon failure of first. Thanks James.Strachan wrote: > > On 3/14/07, garima015 wrote: >> >> I have one more problem related to this >> I am giving the url as >> BROKER_IP_ADDRESS=failover:(tcp://172.31.19.209:61616,tcp://172.31.19.210:61616)?randomize=false >> >> in my configuration file which is read by my Producer class for activemq >> connection. >> I want that it should connect to second broker in case of failure and >> also >> my processing should not stop >> Can you please tell me if i have to give "static" here also. > > No - the above URL looks fine to me. > http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html > >> How are the network of brokers joined in configuration rather than using >> activemq.xml > > They are configured in activemq.xml as described on the page I gave > you in the previous reply > http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Broker-issue-regarding-queue-tf3402927s2354.html#a9482155 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.