Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24008 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2007 18:50:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2007 18:50:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 43805 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2007 18:50:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 43560 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2007 18:50:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 43551 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2007 18:50:37 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:50:37 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.176.63.108] (HELO ext1-chi.ldsys.net) (208.176.63.108) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:50:25 -0800 Received: from [10.10.10.220] (chi.norvax.com [216.146.76.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ext1-chi.ldsys.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B014B80AF for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:50:01 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <45F05ACA.4060304@ldsys.net> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:49:46 -0300 From: "Christopher G. Stach II" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [Spam: 5.0] JMX Remote Access - Necessary ports References: <9355565.post@talk.nabble.com> <45EF3413.8030004@ldsys.net> <608A6F19-E524-4766-AAEE-703769A4CD5A@aconex.com> <9370301.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org James Strachan wrote: > On 3/8/07, Juergen Mayrbaeurl wrote: >> >> What kind of JMX connector do I need for JManage? Can I use the RMI >> connector? Does JManage have to run on the same machine? > > Yeah, I think what Paul meant was to use RMI/JMX locally on the box > then use the HTTP over the firewall to avoid having to tinker with > both the JMX and RMI ports on your firewall. > > Otherwise make sure the RMI and the JMX connector ports are accessible > through the firewall AMQ has a nice feature to bind the registry to a fixed port, but you can't enable any form of security on it. There's an open issue for this. You may just want to use SSH tunneling. -- Christopher G. Stach II