Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22207 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2007 13:59:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2007 13:59:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 33266 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2007 13:59:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 33245 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2007 13:59:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 33236 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2007 13:59:55 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:59:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.46.255.21] (HELO viefep11-int.chello.at) (213.46.255.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:59:44 -0800 Received: from viefep12 ([192.168.13.141]) by viefep11-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with ESMTP id <20070303135920.RZSP12094.viefep11-int.chello.at@viefep12>; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:59:20 +0100 Message-ID: <15882603.1172930360772.JavaMail.root@viefep12> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:59:20 +0100 From: To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: RE: Java Producer and C++ Consumer Cc: Timothy Bish MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, my C++ client is connected to tcp://localhost:61613. Of course I have tried the Java Producer with the URL tcp://localhost:61616 and the messages were created. My problem is that the C++ Consumer did not received anything (but is successfully connected to the queue TEST.FOO). If I start a Java Consumer all is fine. Grzegorz ---- Timothy Bish schrieb: > The Java Producer should probably be using tcp://localhost:61616 as its url, > as that is the default for the openwire transport connector in the broker. > The C++ client would connect to tcp://localhost:61613 assuming that you have > the default stomp settings the same in your broker's configuration. > > Once you do that you should be all set. > > The openwire support in the C++ client is close, I'm working on some issues > with tight marshalling now, but loose marshalling seems to be working just > fine. We are working on new integration tests and unit tests to validate > all the new functionality. Its only a matter of time now. I've got a busy > week next week so it might get delayed a bit until I get a chance to work on > it some more. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: swiatek@chello.at [mailto:swiatek@chello.at] > > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 6:53 AM > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > Subject: Java Producer and C++ Consumer > > Importance: High > > > > I have ActiveMQ 4.1.0 and ActiveMQ-CPP 1.1 installed. > > The language specific examples (Java producer/Java consumers respectively > > C++ producer/C++ consumers) work fine. > > > > Is it now possible with the Stomp protocol to have ordinary JMS producers > > written in Java and queue consumers written in C++? I tried it, but > > without success. I got always following exception trying to start Java > > producer using this URL tcp://localhost:61613 > > > > Caught: javax.jms.JMSException: Wire format negociation timeout: peer did > > not send his wire format. > > > > Will be possible to have the interconnection (Java and C++) with the > > OpenWire protocol? > > When do you expect to release the OpenWire C++ implementation? > > > > Thanks, > > Grzegorz >